IT 635 Research and Theory on Communication and Performance Technology
Course Syllabus
Spring 2014
Professor: Dr. Anthony Betrus

Office: Dunn Hall 393

E-mail: betrusak@potsdam.edu

Phone: (315) 267-2670

Textbooks:
Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008).The craft of research (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Fink, A. (2013). How to conduct surveys (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (2008). Educational Technology: A definition with commentary. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum

Supplemental Readings and Online Resources:

The Many Hats of an Instructional Designer online game: http://www2.potsdam.edu/betrusak/manyhats/manyhats.html
Getting started in instructional technology research.Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. R. (1997).Bloomington, IN: The Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Available online: http://www.aect.org/Intranet/Publications/Research/index.html
The elements of a proposal. Pajares, F. (2007).http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/proposal.html (10 pages)
APA Formatting and Style Guide.OWL at Purdue, Purdue University.(n.d.). http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
Tips for conducting a literature review. Center AlphaPlus Center (2003). Retrieved September 1, 2010 from http://www.idemployee.id.tue.nl/g.w.m.rauterberg/lecturenotes/literatur-search-tips-2004.pdf (9 pages)
How to Recognize Plagiarism: Indiana University: http://www.indiana.edu/~istd/
SUNY Potsdam's College Writing Center (CWC): Citing Sources & Self-Editing Guide

Course Description:
This course is designed to provide an introduction to institutional research via a learning-by-doing approach. Learning experiences include discussion of relevant research issues and completion of a research study that 1) addresses an issue in organizational performance or educational technology, 2) is supported by a current literature review, 3) proposes specific and relevant research questions, 4) describes the use of the survey research methods, 5) reports and discusses the findings, and 6) points out limitations, and 7) provides recommendations for future investigation.

After selecting a topic, the team will determine the focus of the study, review the relevant literature, specify research questions, design instruments, collect and analyze data, present their conclusions, and prepare a research paper for publication. Both collaboration and individual efforts are necessary and essential in this class. The literature review will be conducted individually at first, and ultimately a combined literature review will be produced. After the literature review, one group member may take the lead role in a given phase of the research project, although In every phase each member is expected to contribute significantly. The ultimate goal is to prepare a professional conference presentation and paper for the conference proceedings.

Goal and Objectives:
Overall, this course intends to prepare participants for future independent research endeavors. Specifically, the participants are expected to

- Appropriately design a research study to investigate a problem

- Conduct a survey research study

- Analyze and interpret the data

- Write a research report following APA guidelines

- Prepare a presentation and proceedings paper for a a professional conference.

Course Schedule:

Jan 22

Read and Take Notes: Educational Technology: Chapter 1 and prepare a 1-2 page summary paper for class on Jan 29
Play: The Many Hats of an Instructional Designer card game. Play The Many Hats of an Instructional Designer Online Game
Prepare Elevator Pitch for Jan 29

Jan 29

Theory Discussion: Educational Technology Chapter 1

Students Present 1 minute presentations on potential research topics. Groups of 3 are formed

Monday, February 3, 12:00.  Helping Students Navigate the IRB. Johanne Sullivan, Research and Sponsored Programs. Noon. Location Kellas 101.

Feb 5
Human Subjects Course must be completed by this date. Bring printed copy of completion report to class. http://www.citiprogram.org/ (please complete the BASIC course)
Begin IRB Application Process
Feb 12

Individual Literature Reviews completed by this date
Interview Questions completed
Read and Take Notes: Molenda, Cone of Experience
In-Class Discussion - Schramm's Communication Model

Feb 19

Research Questions Drafted

Theory Discussion: Dale's Cone of Experience vs. the Bogus Cone of Learning

Interviews Conducted and Summarized

Feb 26

Combined Literature Review completed
Interview questions generated and interviews completed
Draft of Survey completed
Draft of IRB application completed

Note that the College Writing Center is available to review your combined literature review. Please set up an appointment for them to work with you by calling or e-mailing.

Location: Carson 106
Phone: 267-3059
E-mail: cwc@potsdam.edu

Mar 5
Survey Pretest

Mar 12

Survey Distributed (round 1)

Read and Take Notes: Educational Technology, Ch 8. Resources

Mar 19

Survey Distributed (round 2). Initial Data Colleciton.
Theory Discussion: Educational Technology, Ch 8. Resources

Read and Take Notes: The Case for Fully Guided Instruction

Mar 26

Data Collection Complete. (No Class, Spring Recess)

Apr 2

Data Analysis Complete. Data sorted, cleaned, and stored in a secure spreadsheet.

Theory Discussion: The Case for Fully Guided Instruction

Read and Take Notes: Principles of Playing Games for Learning

Apr 9
Theory Discussion: Principles of Playing Games for Learning
Draft of Final Paper Due
May 14

Research Presentations

Final Paper Due

Completion of IRB Completion of Study Form

Attendance:
Regular attendance and participation in all activities are considered essential to this class. The quality of team work relies on the team efforts and contribution of each team member. Meanwhile, a collaborative environment fosters individual's growth in learning. Should situations arise which prevent class attendance, please notify the instructor in advance. Given the format of the class, even excused absences may result in a lower grade for he student (at the discretion of the instructor).

Academic Integrity and Plagiarism:
All participants should aspire to high standards of academic honesty. Any single instance of academic dishonesty will result in failure of the assignment in question, and possibly failure of the class and/or expulsion from the program. Participants in this class are expected to properly reference sources when using information from others.

Accommodative Service:
Participants who have documented learning, emotional, and/or physical disabilities, can get academic accommodations through Accommodative Services (110-112 Sisson Hall, SUNY Potsdam. Telephone: 267-3267). Please also see instructor during office hour to discuss this. General information on accommodations can be found at: http://www.potsdam.edu/support/oas/index.cfm

Readings and in-class discussions:
Each participant is expected to complete assigned readings and then actively participate in discussions in the class. Students are expected to be prepared and regularly participate in class, those who do not may have their grade reduce by up to a full grade point, at the discretion of the instructor.

Grading:
Prerequisites
Human Subjects Approval Prepared
Client Interviews Conducted
Survey Pre-tested

Graded Components:
Research study (200 pts.)
Abstract (10 points) (.75 page)
Introduction (10 pts.) (1 page)
Literature review (50 pts.) (3-4 pages)
Purpose and research question(s) (20 pts.) (.5-1 page)
Methodology (20 pts.) (2-4 pages)
Data Analysis (50 pts.) (2-4 pages)
Conclusion (20 pts) ) (1-2 pages)
References (10 pts) (1-2 pages)
Appendices (Survey Instrument, Interview Questions) (10 pts)

180+ --> 4.0
174-179 --> 3.7
166-173 --> 3.3
160-165 --> 3.0
154-159 --> 2.7
146-153 --> 2.3
140-45 --> 2.0