IT 635 Research and Theory on Communication and Performance Technology
Course Syllabus
Spring 2014
Professor: Dr. Anthony Betrus
Office: Dunn Hall 393
E-mail: betrusak@potsdam.edu
Phone: (315) 267-2670
Textbooks:
Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M.
(2008).The craft of research (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of
Chicago Press.
Fink, A. (2013). How to conduct surveys (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (2008). Educational Technology: A definition with commentary. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum
Supplemental Readings and Online Resources:
The Many Hats of an Instructional Designer online game: http://www2.potsdam.edu/betrusak/manyhats/manyhats.html
Getting started in instructional technology research.Ross, S. M., &
Morrison, G. R. (1997).Bloomington, IN: The Association for Educational
Communications and Technology. Available online: http://www.aect.org/Intranet/Publications/Research/index.html
The elements of a proposal. Pajares, F. (2007).http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/proposal.html (10 pages)
APA Formatting and Style Guide.OWL at Purdue, Purdue University.(n.d.). http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
Tips for conducting a literature review. Center AlphaPlus Center (2003). Retrieved September 1, 2010 from http://www.idemployee.id.tue.nl/g.w.m.rauterberg/lecturenotes/literatur-search-tips-2004.pdf (9 pages)
How to Recognize Plagiarism: Indiana University: http://www.indiana.edu/~istd/
SUNY Potsdam's College Writing Center (CWC): Citing Sources & Self-Editing Guide
Course Description:
This course is designed to provide an introduction to institutional
research via a learning-by-doing approach. Learning experiences include
discussion of relevant research issues and completion of a research
study that 1) addresses an issue in organizational performance or
educational technology, 2) is supported by a current literature review,
3) proposes specific and relevant research questions, 4) describes the
use of the survey research methods, 5) reports and discusses the
findings, and 6) points out limitations, and 7) provides
recommendations for future investigation.
After selecting a topic, the team will determine the focus of the study, review the relevant literature, specify research questions, design instruments, collect and analyze data, present their conclusions, and prepare a research paper for publication. Both collaboration and individual efforts are necessary and essential in this class. The literature review will be conducted individually at first, and ultimately a combined literature review will be produced. After the literature review, one group member may take the lead role in a given phase of the research project, although In every phase each member is expected to contribute significantly. The ultimate goal is to prepare a professional conference presentation and paper for the conference proceedings.
Goal and Objectives:
Overall, this course intends to prepare
participants for future independent research endeavors. Specifically,
the participants are expected to
- Appropriately design a research study to investigate a problem
- Conduct a survey research study
- Analyze and interpret the data
- Write a research report following APA guidelines
- Prepare a presentation and proceedings paper for a a professional conference.
Course Schedule:
Jan 22 |
Read and Take Notes: Educational Technology: Chapter 1 and prepare a 1-2 page summary paper for class on Jan 29 |
Jan 29 |
Theory Discussion: Educational Technology Chapter 1 Students Present 1 minute presentations on potential research topics. Groups of 3 are formed Monday, February 3, 12:00. Helping Students Navigate the
IRB. Johanne Sullivan, Research and Sponsored
Programs. Noon. Location Kellas 101. |
Feb 5 |
Human
Subjects Course must be completed by this date. Bring printed copy of
completion report to class. http://www.citiprogram.org/ (please
complete the BASIC course) Begin IRB Application Process |
Feb 12 |
Individual Literature Reviews completed by this date |
Feb 19 |
Research Questions Drafted Theory Discussion: Dale's Cone of Experience vs. the Bogus Cone of Learning Interviews Conducted and Summarized |
Feb 26 |
Combined Literature Review completed Note that the College Writing Center is available to review your combined literature review. Please set up an appointment for them to work with you by calling or e-mailing. Location: Carson 106 |
Mar 5 |
Survey Pretest |
Mar 12 |
Survey Distributed (round 1)
Read and Take Notes: Educational Technology, Ch 8. Resources |
Mar 19 |
Survey Distributed (round 2). Initial Data Colleciton. |
Mar 26 |
Data Collection Complete. (No Class, Spring Recess) |
Apr 2 | Data Analysis Complete. Data sorted, cleaned, and stored in a secure spreadsheet. Theory Discussion: The Case for Fully Guided Instruction Read and Take Notes: Principles of Playing Games for Learning |
Apr 9 |
Theory Discussion: Principles of Playing Games for Learning Draft of Final Paper Due |
May 14 |
Research Presentations Final Paper Due Completion of IRB Completion of Study Form |
Attendance:
Regular attendance and
participation in all activities are considered essential to this class.
The quality of team work relies on the team efforts and contribution of
each team member. Meanwhile, a collaborative environment fosters
individual's growth in learning. Should situations arise which prevent
class attendance, please notify the instructor in advance. Given the
format of the class, even excused absences may result in a lower grade
for he student (at the discretion of the instructor).
Academic Integrity and Plagiarism:
All participants should aspire to high standards of academic honesty.
Any single instance of academic dishonesty will result in failure of
the assignment in question, and possibly failure of the class and/or
expulsion from the program. Participants in this class are expected to
properly reference sources when using information from others.
Accommodative Service:
Participants who have
documented learning, emotional, and/or physical disabilities, can get
academic accommodations through Accommodative Services (110-112 Sisson
Hall, SUNY Potsdam. Telephone: 267-3267). Please also see instructor
during office hour to discuss this. General information on
accommodations can be found at: http://www.potsdam.edu/support/oas/index.cfm
Readings and in-class discussions:
Each participant is expected to complete assigned readings and then
actively participate in discussions in the class. Students are expected
to be prepared and regularly participate in class, those who do not may
have their grade reduce by up to a full grade point, at the discretion
of the instructor.
Grading:
Prerequisites
Human Subjects Approval Prepared
Client Interviews Conducted
Survey Pre-tested
Graded Components:
Research study (200 pts.)
Abstract (10 points) (.75 page)
Introduction (10 pts.) (1 page)
Literature review (50 pts.) (3-4 pages)
Purpose and research question(s) (20 pts.) (.5-1 page)
Methodology (20 pts.) (2-4 pages)
Data Analysis (50 pts.) (2-4 pages)
Conclusion (20 pts) ) (1-2 pages)
References (10 pts) (1-2 pages)
Appendices (Survey Instrument, Interview Questions) (10 pts)
180+ --> 4.0
174-179 --> 3.7
166-173 --> 3.3
160-165 --> 3.0
154-159 --> 2.7
146-153 --> 2.3
140-45 --> 2.0